On the blood worm packets it says they are treated for parasites, so the manufacturers are admitting that blood worms can carry parasites prior to their "treatment", but over the past several years I have noticed more and more that people who regularly feed blood worms eventually end up with their fish getting parasite problems, is this a coincidence? I'm not sure.
I also notice that the sections of the hobby that are the biggest feeders of bloodworms seem to also be the same sections plagued with parasites, for example discus keepers, american cichlid keepers, pleco(omnivorous species) keepers are all plagued by problems with parasitic worms and hexamita, where as the parts of the hobby such as rift lake fish keepers who use less or no blood worms dont seem to have as much issues with these parasites, is this a coincidence? Im not sure.
Personally I think if bloodworms cant be proven they are 100% parasite free they should be banned from sale and until I'm convinced with scientific evidence that they are 100% safe then I will continue to recommend to my friends and fellow hobbyists to never use them, because to me they appear to be a risk.
Can anyone prove blood worms are 100% safe? if not, should there be an investigation into this? if there was a dog or cat food that was suspected of hosting parasites and making our pets sick or worse what would dog and cat clubs do? What I'm saying is obviously not scientific, I could be completely wrong, its just my observation.
Parasites are causing more problems in the cichlid hobby than we can imagine and I believe many deaths and poor health due to parasites is being blamed on other things, like water quality etc because we just aren't getting informed.