F0 G.brasiliensis
#1
Posted 09 July 2012 - 11:43 AM
This beast was almost 36cm and a kg
gb.jpg 42.7KB 118 downloads
To find out more Visit our Website and follow us on facebook for the latest on freshwater fish research in WA.
Kimberley sawfish tagging trip soon
DSC_1314.JPG 1.86MB 72 downloads
#2
Posted 09 July 2012 - 12:03 PM
all ive seen is the same pic of that one fish?
i reason i ask is, if their was more than one, and breeding their would be no stopping them, and would cause a huge problem for ecosystem.
Renato
#3
Posted 09 July 2012 - 12:14 PM
#4
Posted 09 July 2012 - 12:20 PM
thats insane the amount of geo's getting takin out of that river for studdies.. seems unreal.
it also states that the have been there for over 10 years. why has it been so long before studies are being shown to public?
maybe if something was done a while back there wouldnt be so many around now..
its a real shame its come to this.. sounds like a huge mess.
Renato
#5
Posted 09 July 2012 - 12:33 PM
#6
Posted 09 July 2012 - 06:50 PM
The same photo turning up all the time makes me a think the situation is being exagerated by fisheries.
#7
Posted 09 July 2012 - 10:54 PM
Edited by keleherr, 09 July 2012 - 10:57 PM.
#8
Posted 09 July 2012 - 11:09 PM
sorry to be a little pessimistic but the bream are doomed each year from the algae blooms that occur anyway!!!
do brasilliensis tolerate this sort of river polution / deoxygenation of the water from the algae blooms ???
on the downside we lose bream... if theres an upside brasiliensis do taste nice!!!! (so im told...im keen to try some to let ya know for sure!!!)
#9
Posted 10 July 2012 - 12:16 AM
and it was noted stomach contents didnt contain any gambusia??? i would of thought they would of been nice tucker for the adult fish
#10
Posted 10 July 2012 - 01:14 AM
#11
Posted 10 July 2012 - 08:54 AM
#12
Posted 10 July 2012 - 09:00 AM
#13
Posted 10 July 2012 - 10:14 AM
#14
Posted 10 July 2012 - 11:24 AM
I'm willing to give a hand in fishing these bad boys. And I'm sure many of us in these forums would give a helping hand to fish them out.
When you've said that 60 or so of these fish have turned up in a fish kill along with bream (in the Swan). Chances are that they have already taken up residence in the Swan...
#15
Posted 10 July 2012 - 11:55 AM
I'd love to see quality cichlids in our lakes lol
#16
Posted 10 July 2012 - 12:05 PM
Do your best and muster up some intelligence, before you continue to make yourself look like an uneducated oxygen thief.
Alex
Edited by Peckoltia, 10 July 2012 - 04:25 PM.
#17
Posted 10 July 2012 - 12:17 PM
You and other idiots like you are just one of the "stupid" reasons why it's getting harder and harder to import exotic species let alone the ones that have already been deemed NOXIOUS all together.
I have no doubt fisheries read this forum and when they see idiotic comments like yours it will only make them more determined to make it even harder for those of us that enjoy keeping the not so common species of fish. "Even those which cannot survive in our water ways".
So do yourself a favor and think before you open your mouth in future!
Sam
#18
Posted 10 July 2012 - 12:28 PM
#19
Posted 10 July 2012 - 12:36 PM
Troll or not, stupid comments.
#20
Posted 10 July 2012 - 12:54 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users