![Attached File](https://www.perthcichlid.com.au/forum/public/style_extra/mime_types/gif.gif)
![Attached File](https://www.perthcichlid.com.au/forum/public/style_extra/mime_types/gif.gif)
Edited by Chris Bell, 29 November 2016 - 12:11 PM.
Posted 29 November 2016 - 08:39 AM
Edited by Chris Bell, 29 November 2016 - 12:11 PM.
Posted 29 November 2016 - 12:10 PM
Posted 29 November 2016 - 12:16 PM
Posted 29 November 2016 - 03:55 PM
Posted 29 November 2016 - 04:39 PM
Posted 29 November 2016 - 09:29 PM
Posted 30 November 2016 - 01:20 AM
i agree its just a common bristlenose... i see these in the 1000's everyday and theres always a slight visual difference popping up in some...
its like people you get white people and black people and all the inbetween colours.... then you get the red heads and blondes and asians and native american indians etc etc.... all people with slight variations... much the same as the common bristlenose.....
Posted 30 November 2016 - 06:21 AM
No was not convinced that it was anything different, other than, was it a specific line bred variety, eg. Marbled, lemon, longfins etc as I had not seen this colouration (lack of pigment) in the tail before - almost like someone was trying to breed a black/brown and white bn. Bare in mind I have been out of fish for a number of years, and all these line bred varieties are new to meI'm not seeing anything that suggests it's not a common bn other than a lack of pigment in the tail.
What's got you convinced it's something different?
Edited by Chris Bell, 30 November 2016 - 06:22 AM.
Posted 30 November 2016 - 07:30 AM
Posted 30 November 2016 - 10:03 AM
Due to the bristlenose in the Australian
trade likely being the result of multiple Ancistrus species being hybridized, its normal to expect some variation in fry.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users