My concerns about some advice
#1
Posted 22 January 2008 - 11:09 AM
There have been a number of posts recently where respondents have made statements that are , from a scientific viewpoint (chemistry and/or physics ) pure unadulterated nonsense.
It is one thing to offer an opinion: another altogether to make a blanket statement purporting to be fact on a topic when the respondent clearly has no idea what he/she is talking about.
There is potential for considerable harm in such practices, particularly when those seeking help/advice are as lacking in knowledge as the respondents, who offer the advice almost certainly with the best of intentions. (I repeat here the old saying that the way to hell is paved with good intentions ).
Perhaps the way to overcome some aspects of the problem is for respondents to explain their qualifications and/or experience pertaining to a topic when responding. I realise that this could become a tad tedious, and maybe such information should be part of the profile appearing in the descriptor.
Certainly, a little honesty would not be astray, and could be applied simply by the use of "in my opinion", used more frequently, together with the avoidance of providing information without due and true knowledge: the only problem here is that some obviously don't recognise their own ignorance on some topics.
Perhaps some other views would be of value.
Syd.
#2
Posted 22 January 2008 - 03:28 PM
#3
Posted 22 January 2008 - 04:10 PM
But that is some of the problem that Syd is talking about. If you don't know it is incorrect then you take the information at face value.
I certainly don't know how to solve the issue but it is something to consider when recieving advice.
Adam
#4
Posted 22 January 2008 - 04:10 PM
I'm an electrician by trade and i'd hate to see someone follow the advice of someone who really has no idea what their talking about when experience and knowledge from a post i may of posted or anyone else in my field is of more use and of safer practice.
Chris
#5
Posted 22 January 2008 - 04:18 PM
#6
Posted 22 January 2008 - 04:34 PM
that was my point from the above post. It is all good saying that some people don't know what they are talking about...but no matter how strong you say it, eg pure unadulterated nonsense, it won't get the message across..because those people don't know its addressed to them because they think they DO know what they are on about!!!
get what i mean??
i think a simple and nicely written reply to someone's post will not only rectify the wrong advice but it would also go a long way in educating the ignorant poster....everyone wins
#7
Posted 22 January 2008 - 04:39 PM
#8
Posted 22 January 2008 - 04:42 PM
I was agreeing with your post.
#9
Posted 22 January 2008 - 04:45 PM
#10
Posted 22 January 2008 - 04:52 PM
what im trying to say is if people agree in numbers... it gets the point across...
#11
Posted 22 January 2008 - 04:53 PM
Blakey said
and I totally agree.
I understand sydad's concern, but the point I was trying to make was that by making a post like that without examples, or by not telling people straight away in the relevant discussion, no one benefits.
Certainly not trying to get into an argument with anyone...but if I post some bad advice I'd like someone to raise the issue with me straight away so I can learn and be a better fishkeeper/person etc.
Hope that clears up my point.
#12
Posted 22 January 2008 - 05:23 PM
#13
Posted 22 January 2008 - 05:50 PM
#14
Posted 22 January 2008 - 08:05 PM
I am sure that all people give advice in good faith and in another post somewhere I have talked about "common sense" in that there are many "shared understandings" in our culture, some of them are absolutely baseless. Some things work for people often because they don't do any harm, but they don't do any good either.
The bottom line is, that the only constant is change. There is no absolute truth and no-one has a monopoly on knowledge. Once you think you know something, you are probably on the verge of having what you know, reconstructed
Isn't that why we have these forums because we are a community of learners? I daresay also in sydads case, we have a community of teachers. The perfect arrangement if it is constructive
Regards,
Donna
#15
Posted 22 January 2008 - 08:13 PM
#16
Posted 22 January 2008 - 08:25 PM
When I have been really silly, people usually respond with some evidence they have found, or give some rational reason as to why I shouldn't go down particular path. I find that works for me.
Donna
#17
Posted 22 January 2008 - 08:31 PM
(just wanted to add that before someone thinks that i think otherwise...)
#18
Posted 22 January 2008 - 10:52 PM
#19
Posted 22 January 2008 - 10:59 PM
This is a good post, and to let those know, Sydad has pulled me up on more than a few occasions where I have given the wrong info in terms of chemistry...of which he wins hands down!! I too sometimes get a bit 'Ticked Off' with the odd thread or post, and lately I have just resigned myself to ignoring it....I do not wish to get into an argument with some that do not understand a few basic concepts.....I have found it easier to carry on with more interesting or useful posts and also ignore posts that have been up before and can be accessed by clicking the search icon above.
my 2 cents
Oliver
#20
Posted 22 January 2008 - 11:02 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users