Inline Heater Vs Standard Heater
#1
Posted 17 May 2009 - 10:40 PM
There are two shortcomings though:
1. you can't adjust the temp easily
2. they are an eyesore in the tank and also take up room
Inline heaters seem the answer. However, having to heat water as it flows through, it seems to me they would use more power than a standard heater. Has anyone looked into that?
Any other experiences with inline heaters, things to be aware of?
#2
Posted 18 May 2009 - 12:00 AM
#3
Posted 18 May 2009 - 12:15 AM
Keep in mind that the 200w have a 12mm barb on either end and the 300w have a 16mm barb either end.
#4
Posted 18 May 2009 - 10:42 PM
#5
Posted 18 May 2009 - 10:44 PM
#6
Posted 18 May 2009 - 10:53 PM
#7
Posted 18 May 2009 - 10:57 PM
adv. near·er, near·est
1. To, at, or within a short distance or interval in space or time.
2. Just about
3. Almost
4. With or in a close relationship.
Apart from this I cannot say, I will let you know as soon as I do
#8
Posted 18 May 2009 - 11:00 PM
Thanks
#9
Posted 18 May 2009 - 11:06 PM
#10
Posted 19 May 2009 - 01:09 PM
#11
Posted 19 May 2009 - 05:53 PM
woodsy
#12
Posted 19 May 2009 - 06:27 PM
I ordered one from AoA yesterday to try out and I'll wait to see what Aquotix can get in the near future
Waterbed ones are interesting - but I couldn't install one myself under my 6x2x2 and would dread the hassle of replacement when it needs it.....
#13
Posted 20 May 2009 - 06:17 PM
#14
Posted 20 May 2009 - 06:47 PM
#15
Posted 20 May 2009 - 09:32 PM
I may still be interested in yours if you haven't used them or sold them by next week.
#16
Posted 20 May 2009 - 10:47 PM
#17
Posted 21 May 2009 - 06:54 PM
Would you still need a couple of 300 watters for a 6x2x2, or could you get away with just the one ?
Thanks.
#18
Posted 21 May 2009 - 07:46 PM
#19
Posted 21 May 2009 - 07:56 PM
http://www.perthcich...showtopic=24760
I think it would also apply to inline heaters
#20
Posted 21 May 2009 - 08:35 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users