Daylight Savings
#21
Posted 16 May 2009 - 10:27 PM
#22
Posted 16 May 2009 - 10:31 PM
#23
Posted 16 May 2009 - 10:38 PM
the poor hard done by farmers who whinge about anything they can
still no reasonable reasons not to have it yet
anyway i'm off to work i'll see if theres any by time i get back home again
#24
Posted 16 May 2009 - 10:45 PM
#25
Posted 16 May 2009 - 10:45 PM
#26
Posted 16 May 2009 - 10:46 PM
#27
Posted 16 May 2009 - 10:47 PM
#28
Posted 16 May 2009 - 10:48 PM
#29
Posted 16 May 2009 - 10:49 PM
There could be a new marketing avenue there....Watches for cows....think of the revenue.....
One to many Jack's... Sorry Back on topic
#30
Posted 16 May 2009 - 10:53 PM
#31
Posted 16 May 2009 - 10:56 PM
harden up? im not the one crying about "needing to do things in the light" excuse me i do what i need to do and the brightness level/contrast has no bearing on my activities. i'm dumbfounded as to how darkness can stop me having a walk/jog/whatever the heck i wanna do.. how ridiculous. personally i see the only valid point of daylight saving is closer trading hours to the eastern states, end of story.
#32
Posted 16 May 2009 - 11:31 PM
#33
Posted 16 May 2009 - 11:33 PM
Glad you mentioned Jack
Same...I walk, run etc do whatever I want in the dark In fact I prefer it....Its more about the principle of the thing....why do people resist change with such a vengeance? If we had voted yes....chances are it would change back again as the pendulum swings.....the only constant is change....except in WA
Cya
Donna
#34
Posted 17 May 2009 - 07:25 AM
sure, I'd prefer the light
but the dark won't hurt me
I like that we don't have it, but it's only delaying daylight savings, not stopping it.
we are going to keep having referendums until we get it
I thought no means no?
it was the fourth referendum, and this time the biggest no margin
get the picture, the majority don't want it.
#35
Posted 17 May 2009 - 09:43 AM
Unfortunately the majority doesn't always represent the most physically and economically active members of the community......again, as with everything else, we assume its all rational and fair....well it aint.
Just for the sake of argument, if seventeen year olds were allowed to vote...would that have impacted on the outcome?
Of course that is pie in the sky because that is not the way it is....and we have to operate off some system. I just think it is worth considering that it might not be the most effective system to serve the young and up and coming ACTIVE members of our community. Just something to consider in light of our aging population.
Regards,
Donna
#36
Posted 17 May 2009 - 09:46 AM
as a seventeen year old, my vote would have been no, and so would have many people I know
it would have been really close I think
but your right, the majority is older, due to slowing population growth and all that.
#37
Posted 17 May 2009 - 09:55 AM
Its all worked well for me However, unfortunately those people just a couple of years out of voting range, did not get to have any say in the decision....this will impact on them...
#38
Posted 17 May 2009 - 10:30 AM
#39
Posted 17 May 2009 - 10:56 AM
I am thinking if I were a farmer and the kids (if not in boarding school) were able to get themselves to the bus on time for school etc why would you need to set your clocks back? You could just run off the old solar day for a lot of things. I have friends with huge properties who are not overly fussed and they just milk at the same solar time and who cares what it says on the clock? They have negotiated and moved the milk collection time to suit.
Farmers sometimes need to seed all night etc etc...they do what they have to do and are ruled by the sun or by what just needs to be done (eg lots of night work with seeding etc) not the clock. It is possible to be creative, after all, the time on the clock is purely subjective...farmers luckily have a certain amount of autonomy in how they structure their day and don't necessarily have to run to city times. The milk trucks etc, well things that need to be done, just have to be done regardless of "clock" time. Farmers are a lot more flexible and adaptable than people think...and have always been governed by astronomy not a clock face.
Not denying that it would have been an inconvenience for farmers and rural workers...just saying they would have adapted for the brief time daylight saving is in place.
Someone (?) has moved the seasons "back" and they have adapted to this procession (might not have stopped complaining about it though
Anyway, it is clear it took more than the farmers to deliver a "no" verdict. I just hope people who didnt really mind, didn't vote "no" thinking they were helping farmers.....with the vote being compulsory, there is the risk of the swingers thinking they are voting on humanatarian grounds...
Regards,
Donna
#40
Posted 17 May 2009 - 11:12 AM
Its just to bad it didn't get in
Cheers Evan
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users